No deus ex machina here
Much of the focus this morning seems to be on the NY Times report on the Baker-Hamilton commission.
I've always thought the too many people were looking for the Iraq Study Commission to pull off a deus ex machina. Sorry folks, but it isn't going to happen. Yes, it's probably a good idea to talk to Syria and Iran. We should have been talking to them long before this. But, frankly, there's not much good they can do unless we cede Iraq to them, and I can't see Bush doing that. I'm not even sure he will agree to talk, but if he does it will only be to delay the withdrawal.
As Juan Cole points out so clearly today,
WASHINGTON, Nov. 26 — A draft report on strategies for Iraq, which will be debated here by a bipartisan commission beginning Monday, urges an aggressive regional diplomatic initiative that includes direct talks with Iran and Syria but sets no timetables for a military withdrawal, according to officials who have seen all or parts of the document.
I've always thought the too many people were looking for the Iraq Study Commission to pull off a deus ex machina. Sorry folks, but it isn't going to happen. Yes, it's probably a good idea to talk to Syria and Iran. We should have been talking to them long before this. But, frankly, there's not much good they can do unless we cede Iraq to them, and I can't see Bush doing that. I'm not even sure he will agree to talk, but if he does it will only be to delay the withdrawal.
As Juan Cole points out so clearly today,
Syria and Iran are not responsible for the resistance in Ramadi or Baquba and probably can't do anything about it. Therefore negotiating with them is not a silver bullet, though it might be useful in its own right.
What is the military mission? I can't see a practical one. And if there is not a military mission that can reasonably be accomplished in a specified period of time, then keeping US troops in al-Anbar is a sort of murder. Because you know when they go out on patrol, a few of them each week are going to get blown up or shot down. Reliably. Each week. Steadily. It is monstrous to force them to play Russian roulette every day unless there is a clear mission that could thereby be accomplished. There is not.
Senator Chuck Hagel's argument for withdrawal is powerful, but it focuses on the botched character of the American enterprise in Iraq and the monetary expense and cost to our military force structure. Those are important arguments, but could be countered by the White House as insufficiently urgent to require a withdrawal.
That is why I think it is important to keep the focus on the question of the US purpose in occupying the Sunni Arab regions of Iraq. Every time you hear someone say that we have to keep the troops in Iraq, press that person to explain what the mission is exactly and how and when it will be accomplished.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home