Stonewalling
Somehow, I don't think this is a bluff. I think the White House really means to stonewall on this:
WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House stood by Alberto Gonzales on Monday, even as support for the embattled attorney general erodes on Capitol Hill amid new questions about his honesty.
..."We are not negotiating," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. "We are where we are, which is where we were last week. ... I can understand why people would think we have not made the right decision, but we think we have.'"
2 Comments:
You know, I wonder why.
A) He's just stubborn, willful, and arrogant.
B) This is the break in the dam that will (pick a metaphor) swamp the mendacities, partisanship, special interests, and abuses of everything the Regime has done.
(B) is almost too good to be true.
Rove knows the base loves it when he "stands up to pressure." Makes him look like a "real man" -- although it also makes him look like a teeny tiny fraidy-cat who's trying real hard to look like a real man because he isn't. The American public -- excluding the DC press corps -- is finally starting to get it.
Post a Comment
<< Home