Preposterosity
I haven't commented on Tom Friedman's column in the NY Times suggesting that Obama pick Dick Cheney as his running rate because I thought the idea so preposterous it wasn't worthy of comment.
My only question is, what is Tom smoking these days? And, why does the Times keep him?
My only question is, what is Tom smoking these days? And, why does the Times keep him?
posted by walldon | 11:09 AM
1 Comments:
"What he's smoking?" hardly does justice to the sheer stupidity of Friedman. Thinking it would be a good thing to have Mr. No-doubt-he-has-nuclear-weapons-welcomed as liberators-last-throes still in power.
Un-bleeping-believable.
Post a Comment
<< Home