Something fishy
Now, at least two of the major telcos accused of providing phone data to the NSA, Verizon and Bellsouth, have denied it in highly parsed, but nevertheless strong, language. Meanwhile, Orin Hatch tells the press that two FISA judges have been informed of the program and, to his knowledge, have not complained, but were not asked to approve it. "That's not their role," said Hatch. (Then, what is their role?) Despite Verizon's and Bellsouth's denials that they were ever approached by NSA, Qwest says it was approached and refused to comply with the NSA request. So, if NSA approached Qwest, why didn't it approach Verizon and Bellsouth? And, why did it take them five days to issue the denials? These stories just don't make sense.
It seems clear to me that the government is up to something, even if USA Today didn't get it exactly right. And, the participants in this are obviously all banding together to smoke screen the public.
It seems clear to me that the government is up to something, even if USA Today didn't get it exactly right. And, the participants in this are obviously all banding together to smoke screen the public.
1 Comments:
Now see this at Think Progress.
An executive order signed by the President on May 5 allows the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, to authorize a company to conceal activities related to national security. (See 15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(3)(A)) [Note: I see the language there, but it's written with typically dense legalese.]
As the Think Progress poster comments, "There is no evidence that this executive order has been used by John Negroponte with respect to the telcos. Of course, if it was used, we wouldn’t know about it."
Post a Comment
<< Home