Traditional Dems have no margin for error
About 47% of the public would definitely not vote for Kerry, Clinton or Gore. CNN) -- With the presidential election more than two years away, a CNN poll released Monday suggests that nearly half of Americans would "definitely not vote for" Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, John Kerry or Al Gore, repeatedly tops lists of potential 2008 Democratic candidates.
Will DNC finally get the message that new blood is needed expecially that it is a given that the GOP will obstruct or destroy at least 5% of the votes for a Democrat (see this Blog previously re. RFJ Jr.
Will DNC finally get the message that new blood is needed expecially that it is a given that the GOP will obstruct or destroy at least 5% of the votes for a Democrat (see this Blog previously re. RFJ Jr.
posted by Anonymous | 10:59 PM
1 Comments:
marketingace: You need to get a spell checker. And a grammar checker. And a punctuation editor. Or, best yet, a proof reader who has absorbed all those competencies and vets your copy before you post. If Scatablog aspires to carry weight in the blogosphere, it needs to be as clean as sites like Hullabaloo and Bitch Ph.D. and... well, plenty of others too numerous, as they say (scrub clichés in the bargain), to mention. Okay, Kos and Atrios are exceptions who probably merit their grandfathered pass on misspellings and run-on -- or truncated -- sentences. But lattercomers can't presume on the old sloppy informality of dashed-off e-mail prose. Neologisms like "expecially" and "(see this Blog previously re. RFJ Jr." -- no close paren, the weird period after "re" (a colon, maybe, implied?) and who the hell is RFJ, much less Jr.? -- distract the reader and vitiate authorial cred. Sorry to lay it on so publicly, but this has been bothering me for a while. Your good ideas are undercut by their slapdash expression and Scatablog (other contributors are not altogether immmune to these criticisms) suffers for it.
Post a Comment
<< Home