Lies and the lying liars
From the Washington Post:
Also, doesn't it seem very convenient that, while Lehman seems to believe he was deliberately lied to under oath, he says, "But in the order of magnitude of things, going after bureaucrats because they misled the commission didn't seem to make sense to me." I wonder how he would have acted if this had been a Democratic bureaucracy instead of a Republican one.
Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.I have a lot of confidence that the Inspectors General from the Bush-appointed Department of Transportation and Department of Defense will get right to the bottom of this.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the bungled response to the hijackings, these sources said.
In the end, the panel agreed to a compromise, turning over the allegations to the inspectors general for the Defense and Transportation departments, who can make criminal referrals if they believe they are warranted, officials said.
"We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
…"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview. "The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. . . . This is not spin. This is not true."
…John F. Lehman, a Republican commission member and former Navy secretary, said in a recent interview that he believed the panel may have been lied to but that he did not believe the evidence was sufficient to support a criminal referral.
"My view of that was that whether it was willful or just the fog of stupid bureaucracy, I don't know," Lehman said. "But in the order of magnitude of things, going after bureaucrats because they misled the commission didn't seem to make sense to me."
Also, doesn't it seem very convenient that, while Lehman seems to believe he was deliberately lied to under oath, he says, "But in the order of magnitude of things, going after bureaucrats because they misled the commission didn't seem to make sense to me." I wonder how he would have acted if this had been a Democratic bureaucracy instead of a Republican one.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home