Rice v. Clinton
From the New York Post:
Seems to me the scales tip in Clinton's favor.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making "flatly false" claims that the Bush administration didn't lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.So it comes down to "he said, she said." Well, on the one hand we have "mushroom cloud" Rice, who told us we had to go to war with Iraq because of WMD. On the other hand, we have "I didn't have sex with that woman" Bill. Which lie was bigger? Furthermore, just what did Geeorge Bush do pre-9/11? All I recall is time at Crawford.
Seems to me the scales tip in Clinton's favor.
posted by walldon | 12:01 PM
1 Comments:
"He said, she said"? Sadly, that is the response The Regime is hoping for. Actually, it's "he said, she lied": yes they are once again simply trotting out the Big Lie. Lenin would be so proud.
Look for example at Mahablog's piece today, which documents the case against Condi's fairytale.
One does note with admiration, however, how The Regime uses Bill's fairly reluctant criticism, offered in his own self-defense, as if it were some sort of outlandish offensive in his part. Lenin and Goebbels would be proud.
Post a Comment
<< Home