With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?
I guess this happened while I was away, because I didn't hear about it till today, but it looks like enough to me to take Barak Obama off my presidential wish list and relegate him to Hillaryville. As I understand it, he came out in favor of sending Bush a "clean" supplemental spending bill with no timetables after Bush vetos the current bill.
What in the hell is wrong with these people? Don't they understand that the public is sick and tired of this war? They're just going to perpetuate the image that Democrats are weak wussies who can't be trusted to handle the reins of state.
What in the hell is wrong with these people? Don't they understand that the public is sick and tired of this war? They're just going to perpetuate the image that Democrats are weak wussies who can't be trusted to handle the reins of state.
posted by walldon | 3:19 PM
2 Comments:
We'll succeed in knocking them all out of the race by focusing on pulling out certain words reported to have been said. Why let the Republican message machine do it when we can do it ourselves? Then we can put up kos for the job. He understands how easy it is.
Not to pile on, WallDon, but here is a link to Obama's Senate speech, introducing his Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007 to remove all troops by March 31st, 2008.
And here is a Chicago Sun-Times article from 4/13 in which he clarifies a comment that was taken as his retreat from confrontation with a Bush veto.
Insurgent pragmatist or defeatist? Judge for yourself. (I think it is at least a bit ambiguous.) The reporting on this is characteristically awful.
Post a Comment
<< Home