Wingnut screed

I came across this wingnut piece and decided to post it whole. It impeaches itself without further comment:

We rest our case. We, the American people, won.

This concludes the series of research-backed published editorial insights revealing the slanders and lies aired in public out of malice by Bush public executioners and anti-government accusers, and also exposing the calumny of American Empire haters that smeared the President and for so long had disgraced this country in the eyes of the world.

In court and in the bar of public opinion, out of control radicals and raving hate-America liberals, some of them are still hallucinating on Bush’s impeachment like Don Quixote charging the windmill – lost their arguments on torture, spying program and terrorist rights.

The Democrat Congress also lost the troop withdrawal budget challenge to President Bush. It has no recourse but to pass the bill according to what the President wants. AP reported on May 25, 2007, that “Congress passed the revised $120 billion spending bill on Thursday, providing $95 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan through September. The House voted 280-142 to pass the bill, followed by a 80-14 vote in the Senate …

The losing petty politicians in Congress capitulated. “Democrats dropped from the legislation a provision [rider] ordering troops home from Iraq beginning this fall.” [AP] President Bush did not want this unconstitutional rider in the budget bill and wanted it removed, and rightly so.

Politicking Democrats and some Republican opportunists in Congress realized they couldn’t bamboozle the President to sign a war funding bill into law that contains a constitutionally abscess appendix that orders Bush to withdraw our troops in Iraq. Unless this politically transmittable unconstitutional carbuncle is removed, the bill would hardly survive the President’s veto that Democrats in Congress do not have the number to override.

With the voice of the people urging him to stay the course in Iraq until the mission is completed, Bush won this eye-ball-to-eyeball budget confrontation with addicted politically-correct incorrigibles in Congress who just wanted to embarrass the Bush administration regardless of the dangerous consequences of their troop withdrawal diversion tactic appended to the budget bill that ensures our defeat in Iraq. It was one of the Democrats’ worst politicking blunders in the history of U.S. Congress.

But we can pick up the broken pieces of legislative sanity that the Democrats had politically crushed. To drop a losing argument and admit defeat moves us forward. The sooner cheap politicians in this out of control Congress realize their folly, the better. Bush cannot be forced to sign a bill that violates the Constitution. Congress broke the Separation of Powers under the Constitution when it attempted to usurp the power of the President to order the redeployment and withdrawal of troops in Iraq – a constitutional prerogative that only belongs to the President of the United States as Commander-In-Chief.

We are referring to the defeat of those who have arguments not only in the Democrat Congress but also of those arguing at large, run-of-the-mill they may be, and even though how badly distorted they may be.

For example, we do not take into consideration the murky thinking of those who just spit dirt out of frustration because they cannot argue intelligently. The turn blue with envy others can, and just attack. The forum for public debate is infested by their obnoxious presence in the Internet through blogs and poison e-mails. They know how to write grade school English, but without any argument to present, they just resort to name-calling using the f… and the s… words, the most common language of the gutter, like a hopeless raving retarded in an institution for special persons that there is nothing more we can do except show our compassion for afflicted human beings. Their common disease that sores public debates is only to attack the messenger, for not having the capacity to understand the message, to bash the singer, for failure to appreciate the song. Since they lost themselves in poison e-mails, we don’t even have to remember their names.

To avoid contamination when their diseased intervention invades the public forum in the form of e-mails, we just sterilized our computer by deleting them as spam.

Here’s the problem why they don’t count in the assessment of the defeat of the radical arguments: To the ignorant and the uneducated, as if to be filthy and licentious, let alone vulgar and vitriolic, is the way to win an argument in a written public debate. That is not what a legitimate dissenter using the constitutional majesty of free speech is all about. It is not also what school education is all about to a person who wants to register his/her opinion in a public debate that impacts the nation.

To be able to argue and do justice to the constitutional freedom of expression, one has to have brain, not just muscular emotions that hit the roof. Unfortunately, rejects don’t have it. You can check this out when in doubt: Atheists who defy the law of divine providence believe that not all men are created equal. I say that they have a good point in politics although not in religion from where some of the sparks of life originate. In the science of statistics called “the universe”, a minute minority of subjects polled that neither understand nor answer simple questions are just treated as “errors” or “discards”. In census-taking and random survey, they are statistics’ rejects in the plus-minus [+][-] law of compensating errors.

Speaking of public support, torture, otherwise known as “waterboarding”, and the NSA wiretapping program that saved thousands of American lives, are overwhelmingly supported by the American people.

On terrorist rights, the high court of the land banged the gavel declaring that captured terrorists imprisoned in Guantanamo and elsewhere, have no rights similar to the constitutional rights of Americans they murdered. [Court of Appeals, Washington, D.C. February 20, 2007.] This terrorist rights issue is resolved. The American people represented by President Bush, won. Liberal terrorist protectors and government haters, lost. This is now public knowledge. It can be checked out all over the Net.

Lurching at the shaded edge of politics where we are likely to fall over, the defeat of the Liberal arguments to destroy, is the gospel of the American people that should be schooled in and preached to guide the public in taking critical decisions, more so when we are at war and the survival of the nation is at stake. In court and in the bar of public opinion, the defeat of the enemy within in this regard, should be read in the tombstone of history.

Let’s look at how the Liberals and their radical army of war dissenters lost the argument on the issue of torture.