How about actually reading an objective description of the House and Senate bills?

Further to my post from a couple of days ago, I would suggest people take the time and effort to read a careful, detailed, objective and expert description of the House and Senate bills put together by the Kaiser Foundation -- rather than relying on conclusory declarations of what either supposedly does from those who have a particular political ax to grind, really have little expertise in healthcare economics, and have not really read the bill carefully. Then tell us all that either the Senate bill or the House bill does nothing, or is worse than doing nothing.