Washington Post gets it (sort of)

It appears that even the Washington Post doesn't like Bush's legal arguments in support of his program to spy on everyone. Here's the first paragraph:

THE MOST detailed legal justification to date for the National Security Agency's warrantless domestic surveillance has emerged from the Bush administration, but the 42-page version isn't any more convincing than its shorter predecessors. In some ways -- particularly in its broad conception of presidential power in wartime -- it is more disturbing.