Publius compares Fitzgerald to Starr, Starr loses

Publius makes several good points in this piece comparing Fitzgerald to Ken Starr:

The latest revelations apparently came from Libby's testimony in 2003, well before the election. Assuming the testimony had been about Clinton, what do you think the chances are that Ken Starr would have kept it under wraps (and away from Matt Drudge) until after the election? Slim to none, I say.

The impeachment mess is certainly a stain on Clinton. But I hope he can rest easier at night knowing that it also exposed the unprofessional, unethical, and unconstitutional behavior of Ken Starr and discredited him for life and in the eyes of future historians.

On an aside, I suspect Fitzgerald has a lot of other politically-damaging information that he (unlike his predecessors) hasn't leaked to Matt Drudge. Maybe that's why the White House has been hestitant to Swift Boat him.