Clinton attack dogs goes after Obama and Edwards
I have to agree with Chris Bowers on this one. Hillary Clinton sending her attack dog out to challege Obama and Edwards on their "electability" at this (or any) stage in the campaign is not good for the party, and it should stop.
I have to add to this that I've seen both Edwards and Obama interviewed several times since their announcements and neither one has had anything but praise for Hillary when asked about her point blank. Yes, sooner or later people will have to draw distinctions between themselves and the rest of the field, but it should be done primarily on policy differences, not personality differences. I would hate to see this campaign come down to mudslinging against other Democrats. The Republicans will be doing plenty of in that all good time, my pretties.
I have to add to this that I've seen both Edwards and Obama interviewed several times since their announcements and neither one has had anything but praise for Hillary when asked about her point blank. Yes, sooner or later people will have to draw distinctions between themselves and the rest of the field, but it should be done primarily on policy differences, not personality differences. I would hate to see this campaign come down to mudslinging against other Democrats. The Republicans will be doing plenty of in that all good time, my pretties.
2 Comments:
But why assume Hillary "sent" her "attack dogs" out? I don't assume she controls everyone affiliated with DLC. Besides, that is a Fox talking point: that Hillary will do anything -- anything -- to win. Same story they successfully pushed againt Gore.
Hillary can win. Barack can win. So can Edwards. Gore could, too.
Kissweb,
Point taken
Post a Comment
<< Home